A business user asks why an opaque model rejected a particular application. An LLM produces a fluent explanation without access to the decision model inputs or an explanation method. How should the team treat this text?

1. As an unverified generated rationale, not evidence of the actual factors behind the model decision.
2. As a faithful explanation solely because the language is clear and confident.
3. As proof that the original model is inherently transparent.
4. As an exact mathematical guarantee of fairness for all future applicants.