This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.
Learn more.
A candidate-screening model has acceptable overall accuracy, but an audit finds substantially worse error rates for one demographic subgroup. Which conclusion is most appropriate?
Published
- Aggregate performance can hide unequal outcomes; investigate subgroup metrics, data, labels, and the intended fairness requirements.
- Removing subgroup evaluation results makes the model fairer.
- Acceptable overall accuracy proves that every subgroup receives equally good outcomes.
- A lower inference latency automatically resolves the observed subgroup error gap.
Comments — 0
Sign in to comment