This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.
Learn more.
A storage account uses geo-redundant storage. An application assumes the secondary always contains the last acknowledged primary write. What should the architect explain?
Published
- GRS automatically makes every application active-active without changes
- Geographic replication is asynchronous and a forced regional failover can lose recent writes
- An account's resource name controls replication lag
- Every geo-redundant secondary is synchronously committed for each write
Comments — 0
Sign in to comment